(PC) Randolph v. CSP Sacramento et al, No. 2:2019cv01670 - Document 15 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/8/2020 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed 8/31/2020, in full; DISMISSING Plaintiff's first amended complaint without leave to amend for failure tostate a claim; and, DIRECTING the Clerk to close this case. CASE CLOSED (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
(PC) Randolph v. CSP Sacramento et al Doc. 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL RANDOLPH, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:19-cv-1670 JAM CKD P v. ORDER CSP SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 31, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 31, 2020, are adopted in full; 3 2. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint is dismissed without leave to amend for failure to 4 5 state a claim; and, 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 6 7 8 9 DATED: December 8, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.