(PS) Iegorova v. Feygan, No. 2:2019cv01512 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/29/2019 ADOPTING in FULL 5 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's 1 Complaint is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the substantiality doctrine. DENI ED as MOOT 2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is DECLARED a Vexatious Litigant. The Court ISSUES a prefiling order as described in Section II.D of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations, and the Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to CLOSE this case. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)

Download PDF
(PS) Iegorova v. Feygan Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LIUDMYLA IEGOROVA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:19-cv-1512-MCE-KJN PS ORDER v. DANIIL FEYGAN, 15 Defendant. 16 On October 7, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 17 18 5), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 19 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were 20 filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 21 22 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 23 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 24 1983). 25 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 26 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 5) are ADOPTED in full; 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter 2 jurisdiction pursuant to the substantiality doctrine; 3 3. 4 4. Plaintiff is DECLARED a Vexatious Litigant; 5 5. The Court ISSUES a pre–filing order as described in Section II.D of the Magistrate 6 Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED as moot; Judge’s Findings and Recommendations; and 7 6. The Clerk of the Court is ordered to CLOSE this case. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: October 29, 2019 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.