(PC) Wilkins v. Barber et al, No. 2:2019cv01338 - Document 148 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/16/2021 ADOPTING in FULL 140 Findings and Recommendations. DENYING 119 Motion for Injunctive Relief, and DENYING 144 Motion for recusal of the assigned magistrate judge. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 KEENAN WILKINS, aka NERRAH BROWN, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:19-cv-1338 WBS KJN P ORDER v. DR. CHRISTINE S. BARBER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On January 14, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. Defendants filed no reply. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 1 1 2 On January 25, 2021, plaintiff filed a Motion for Recusal of the assigned magistrate judge. The motion does not set forth an adequate basis for recusal. See 28 U.S.C. §144. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 14, 2021 (ECF No. 140), are adopted 5 in full; 6 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 119) is denied; and 7 3. Plaintiff’s motion for recusal of the assigned magistrate judge (ECF No. 144) is denied. 8 Dated: February 16, 2021 9 10 11 12 /wilk1338.805.3 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.