(HC) Norsworthy v. Espinoza, No. 2:2019cv01240 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/29/2020 ADOPTING in full the findings and recommendations filed 3/23/2020, (ECF 9 ); and DISMISSING this case without prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Becknal, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Norsworthy v. Espinoza Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 MICHELLE-LAEL BRYANNA NORSWORHTY, Petitioner, 13 ORDER v. 14 15 No. 2:19-cv-1240 MCE AC P J. ESPINOZA, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 19 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 20 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 23, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 22 which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to 23 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 9. Petitioner 24 has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 26 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 27 ORDERED that: 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 23, 2020, (ECF 9) are ADOPTED in 1 2 full; 3 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: April 29, 2020 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
