(PC) Morgan v. Sacramento County Sheriffs Dept. et al, No. 2:2019cv01179 - Document 99 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/2/2020 ADOPTING in FULL 72 Findings and Recommendations. DENYING 52 Motion for injunctive relief, and this matter is REFERRED back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings.(Reader, L)

Download PDF
(PC) Morgan v. Sacramento County Sheriffs Dept. et al Doc. 99 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAMMY DAVIS MORGAN, 12 No. 2:19-CV-1179-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 MORGAN, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 17 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 19 Eastern District of California local rules. On August 13, 2020, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations, 20 21 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 22 within the time specified therein. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the findings and 23 recommendations. See ECF Nos. 78 and 79. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 26 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 13, 2020, are adopted in 4 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief, ECF No. 52, is denied; and 5 3. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further 3 full; 6 pretrial proceedings. 7 DATED: December 2, 2020. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.