(SS) Berg v. Social Security Administration, No. 2:2019cv01124 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/2021 ADOPTING 9 The Findings and Recommendations in full; This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders; and The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(SS) Berg v. Social Security Administration Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MATTHEW BERG, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:19-CV-1124-JAM-DMC v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this action for judicial review of a final 18 19 decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The matter was 20 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On January 2, 2020, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 21 22 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 23 objections within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations 24 have been filed. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 26 supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 2, 2020, are adopted in 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and 3 4 5 6 full; failure to comply with court rules and orders; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. 7 8 9 10 DATED: April 26, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
