(PS) Yegorov v. Dzyba, No. 2:2019cv01110 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/17/19 RECOMMENDING that this action be Dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court's order. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 21 days of service of this order. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
(PS) Yegorov v. Dzyba Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DMITRIY YEGOROV, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 VERA DZYBA, 15 No. 2:19-cv-01110 MCE AC (PS) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the 18 undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On July 30, 2019, the 19 court granted plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but rejected his complaint because it 20 did not contain a cognizable cause of action. ECF No. 3. The court granted plaintiff 30 days to 21 file an amended complaint. Id. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so could lead to a 22 recommendation that the action be dismissed. Id. at 5-6. Plaintiff did not file an amended 23 complaint. Plaintiff’s mail was returned, and per Local Rule 183(b), plaintiff had 63 days (until 24 October 14, 2019) to update his address with the court. Plaintiff did not update his address. 25 Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s orders, nor taken any action to prosecute this case. 26 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without 27 prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s order. See Fed. R. 28 Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one 3 (21) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 4 objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 5 Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 6 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 7 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 8 DATED: October 17, 2019 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.