(PC)Ireland v. White, et al, No. 2:2019cv01104 - Document 14 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/5/2019 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed 10/8/2019, in full; DENYING Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunctive relief(ECF No. 6 ); and this matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Becknal, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC)Ireland v. White, et al Doc. 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROD WILLIAM IRELAND, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:19-cv-1104-KJM-EFB P v. ORDER SOLANO COUNTY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff proceeds without counsel in this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The 17 18 matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) 19 and Local Rule 302. On October 8, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 20 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to 23 the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 24 25 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 26 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 27 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 8, 2019, are adopted in full; 5 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunctive relief 6 7 8 9 (ECF No. 6) is DENIED; and 3. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. DATED: December 5, 2019. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
