(HC) McFadden v. Unknown, No. 2:2019cv01056 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/30/19 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court's order. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) McFadden v. Unknown Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONTAE L. McFADDEN, 12 13 14 No. 2:19-cv-01056 TLN GGH P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254. The matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c). 20 On September 16, 2019, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 13. However, 21 petitioner failed to file an opposition, or statement of non-opposition within the requisite deadline. 22 See ECF No. 8. On November 4, 2019, the court issued an order to show cause ordering 23 petitioner to show cause within 14 days, why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to 24 prosecute and/or to follow a court order pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(b). ECF 25 No. 16. Petitioner was further informed that the filing of an opposition, or statement of non- 26 opposition, within the timeframe would serve as cause and would discharge the November 4, 27 2019 order. Id. Petitioner has not responded to the court’s orders, nor taken any action to 28 prosecute this case. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without 2 prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s order. See Fed. R. 3 Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. 4 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 5 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 6 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 7 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 8 Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within 9 fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections 10 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 11 Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 12 Dated: December 30, 2019 13 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
