(PS) Conerly et al v. Veracity Research Company et al, No. 2:2019cv01021 - Document 55 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/4/2021 ADOPTING in FULL 51 Findings and Recommendations. GRANTING 44 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 12 , is DISMISSED with prejudice, and leave to amend is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Conerly et al v. Veracity Research Company et al Doc. 55 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CARINA CONERLY, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. No. 2:19-cv-1021-KJM-KJN PS ORDER (ECF Nos. 44, 51, 53) VERACITY RESEARCH CO. LLC, et al., Defendants. 16 17 On December 15, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, ECF 18 No. 51, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 19 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On December 29, 20 2020, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations, ECF No. 53, which this 21 court has carefully considered. 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 23 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 24 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. The 25 court acknowledges the frustrations plaintiff articulates in her objections and appreciates the 26 challenges a pro se plaintiff faces in attempting to litigate a case in federal court. Upon a careful 27 review of the findings and recommendations, as noted, the court has determined they faithfully 28 apply the law to the facts and factual allegations of the case. Upon a review of the docket of the 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 case, the court is unable to identify any indication that the magistrate judge’s determinations in 2 this case reflect impermissible racial or other bias. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations, ECF No. 51, are ADOPTED IN FULL; 5 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, ECF No. 44, is GRANTED; 6 3. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 12, is DISMISSED WITH 7 PREJUDICE, and leave to amend is DENIED; and 8 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE this case 9 DATED: March 4, 2021. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
