(PC) Young et al v. Diaz et al, No. 2:2019cv00983 - Document 19 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/6/2019 ADOPTING in FULL 15 Findings and Recommendations. DENYING 5 , and 10 Motions for class certification. All class actions claims re DISMISSED without prejudice, and Young's individual claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.(Reader, L)

Download PDF
(PC) Young et al v. Diaz et al Doc. 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 ZURI S. YOUNG and GEORGE LOVIN JACKSON, Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 No. 2:19-cv-983-JAM-EFB P ORDER v. RALPH M. DIAZ, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs, state prisoners proceeding pro se, have filed this civil rights action seeking 18 relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On October 17, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiffs and which contained notice to plaintiffs that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff Young has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 17, 2019, are adopted in full; 3 2. The motions for class certification (ECF Nos. 5 & 10) are DENIED; 4 3. All class action claims are DISMISSED without prejudice; and 5 4. Young’s individual claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. 6 7 8 9 DATED: December 6, 2019 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.