(PC) Candler v. Diaz et al, No. 2:2019cv00819 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/9/2021 RECOMMENDING the complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim for the reasons set forth in the 4/12/2021 Screening Order. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
(PC) Candler v. Diaz et al Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEITH W. CANDLER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 R. DIAZ, et al., 15 No. 2:19-cv-0819 TLN AC P ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 17 By order filed April 12, 2021, the complaint was screened and found to not state a claim 18 for relief. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was given thirty days to file an amended complaint and cautioned 19 that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 6-7. 20 After plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, he was given an additional twenty-one days to 21 amend the complaint and warned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this 22 action be dismissed without further warning. ECF No. 11. Twenty-one days have now passed, 23 and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the complaint be dismissed for 25 failure to state a claim for the reasons set forth in the April 12, 2021 Screening Order (ECF No. 26 8). See L.R. 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 28 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 2 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 3 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 4 failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 5 Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 DATED: July 9, 2021 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.