(PS) Walrath v. Doan, No. 2:2019cv00811 - Document 16 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/7/2019 ADOPTING 11 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. This action is REMANDED to the Sacramento County Superior Court. (Huang, H)

Download PDF

(PS) Walrath v. Doan Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ASHLEY M. WALRATH, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:19-cv-0811 JAM DB PS ORDER WILLIAM DOAN, 15 Defendant. 16 Defendant is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States 17 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On July 9, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 19 20 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings 22 and recommendations. Defendant has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 9, 2019 (ECF No. 11) are adopted in full; 3 2. Defendant’s May 8, 2019 motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied; 4 5 6 and 3. This action is remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court. DATED: October 7, 2019 7 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 _____ /walrath0811.jo 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.