(PC) Abdullah v. Dacuycuy et al, No. 2:2019cv00804 - Document 21 (E.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/5/2021 VACATING the 17 Findings and Recommendations filed on 10/28/2020; and DENYING plaintiff's 20 request for an abeyance. Plaintiff shall file a response to the Court's screening order within 60 days from the date of this order. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HANIF S. ABDULLAH, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:19-cv-0804 TLN DB P v. ORDER DACUYCUY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 17 18 action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 28, 2020, the Court issued findings and 19 recommendations to dismiss this action for plaintiff’s failure to keep the Court apprised of his 20 current address and for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff has now filed objections. Good cause 21 appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. The October 28, 2020, findings and recommendations (ECF No. 17) are vacated; and 23 2. Plaintiff’s request for an abeyance is denied; and 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 2 3 3. Plaintiff shall file a response to the Court’s screening order within sixty days from the date of this Order. Dated: January 5, 2021 4 5 6 7 /DLB7; DB/Inbox/Routine/abdu0804.vacate F&R 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
