(PS) Johnson v. Vigen, No. 2:2019cv00769 - Document 15 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/13/2020 ADOPTING 14 Findings and Recommendations, DISMISSING this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)
Download PDF
(PS) Johnson v. Vigen Doc. 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TODD LADON JOHNSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:19-cv-00769-KJM-KJN PS ORDER v. LAUREN VIGEN, 15 Defendant. 16 On March 5, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 17 18 served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 19 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 20 21 recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to 22 keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service 23 of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 24 25 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 26 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 27 1983). 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 3 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed March 5, 2020, are ADOPTED; 5 2. This action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 41(b); and 7 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 8 DATED: October 13, 2020. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2