(HC) Conners v. Pfeiffer, No. 2:2019cv00638 - Document 13 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/21/2019 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign a district judge to this action and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed. Assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ENOCH CONNERS, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:19-cv-0638 DB P v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PFEIFFER, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 17 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner alleges prison officials have failed to provide 19 him with a hearing regarding the alleged miscalculation of his release date. By order dated July 31, 2019, the court dismissed the original petition and granted 20 21 petitioner thirty days leave to file an amended petition. (ECF No. 12.) Petitioner was advised 22 that failure to file an amended petition would result in a recommendation that this action be 23 dismissed. Those thirty days have passed, and petitioner has not filed an amended petition, 24 requested additional time to file an amended petition, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 25 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to randomly assign a district 26 judge to this action. 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 2 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. See E.D. Cal. R. 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 5 after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 6 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 7 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that 8 failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 9 Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 Dated: October 21, 2019 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 DLB:12 20 DLB:1/Orders/Prisoner/Habeas/conn0638.dism 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.