(PC) Gleason v. Moss et al, No. 2:2019cv00621 - Document 21 (E.D. Cal. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/27/2020 ADOPTING 13 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING claims against defendants Voong and Arnold without prejudice. (Huang, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS LEE GLEASON, JR., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:19-cv-0621-WBS-EFB P v. ORDER M. VOONG, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 11, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 11, 2020, are adopted in full; and 27 28 ///// 1 1 2. Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Voong and Arnold are dismissed without 2 prejudice. 3 Dated: April 27, 2020 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
