(PC) Howell v. Johnson et al, No. 2:2019cv00611 - Document 39 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/23/2021 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 30 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Rodriguez, E)

Download PDF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAREEM J. HOWELL, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:19-cv-0611 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS J. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. 16 17 By order signed on October 7, 2021, the court declared plaintiff a vexatious litigant under 18 the provisions of Title 3A, part 2, of the California Code of Civil Procedure, adopted by this 19 Court pursuant to Local Rule 151(b). By the same order, the court ordered plaintiff to post 20 security in the amount of $8,800.00 within thirty days in order for this litigation to proceed. That 21 time period has expired, and plaintiff has not posted security. 22 23 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30) days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 28 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 1 1 failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 2 Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 Dated: November 23, 2021 4 5 6 DLB7 howe0611.fifpsecurity 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.