(PC) Patton v. Loadholt et al, No. 2:2019cv00451 - Document 124 (E.D. Cal. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/23/2022 ADOPTING 113 Findings and Recommendations in full, DISMISSING the Doe Defendants named in the fifth amended complaint. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
(PC) Patton v. Loadholt et al Doc. 124 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY L. PATTON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:19-cv-0451 KJM KJN P v. ORDER F.N.P. LOADHOLT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 1, 2022 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 21 served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the 23 findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 26 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 1, 2022 are adopted in full; 3 2. The Doe Defendants named in the fifth amended complaint are dismissed; and 4 3. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 5 proceedings. 6 DATED: May 23, 2022. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.