(PC) Hill v. Kernan et al, No. 2:2019cv00448 - Document 15 (E.D. Cal. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 4/3/2020 ADOPTING in full 10 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 6 defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (Kastilahn, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENNETH HILL, 12 13 14 No. 2:19-cv-00448 MCE DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SCOTT KERNAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 3, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff and the defendants 23 have filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 3, 2020, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 6) is DENIED without prejudice. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: April 3, 2020 6 7 8 9 10 / 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
