(PC)Moore v. Ali et al, No. 2:2019cv00332 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/3/19 ADOPTING 10 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 1 , 6 , 7 Motions for temporary restraining orders. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
(PC)Moore v. Ali et al Doc. 12 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 EUGENE EDWARD MOORE, 6 Plaintiff, 7 8 No. 2:19-cv-0332 JAM KJN P v. ORDER KASHIF ALI, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 12 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 13 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 3, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 14 15 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 16 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to 17 the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 18 19 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 20 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 3, 2019, are adopted in full; and 21 22 23 24 //// 2. Plaintiff’s motions for temporary restraining orders (ECF Nos. 1, 6, 7) are denied without prejudice. 25 26 27 28 DATED: September 3, 2019 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.