(PC) Brown v. Newsom et al, No. 2:2019cv00329 - Document 24 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/10/2020 GRANTING plaintiff's 22 request for an extension and DENYING without prejudice plaintiff's 23 motion for stay. Plaintiff has until 6/30/2020 to file objections to the findings and recommendations. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEXTER BROWN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:19-cv-0329 TLN KJN P v. ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff filed his second request for an extension of time to file objections to the February 17 18 21, 2020 findings and recommendations, and also filed a motion to stay these proceedings. 19 Plaintiff states that due to the current COVID-19 pandemic, California Health Care Facility is on 20 modified program since March 18, 2020. Such program deprives plaintiff of law library access, 21 which means he is unable to use the ADA word processor, and can only access legal authorities 22 by using the paging system. Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s request for an extension of time is 23 granted. In light of such lengthy extension, no stay of this action is required at this time. Plaintiff 24 is cautioned that he is granted an extension of time to file objections to the findings and 25 recommendations, not to further seek leave to amend. Plaintiff has previously filed amended 26 complaints, and the court is not inclined to grant plaintiff further leave to amend in this action. 27 Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). 28 //// 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time (ECF No. 22) is granted; 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for stay (ECF No. 23) is denied without prejudice; and 4 3. Plaintiff is granted until June 30, 2020, in which to file objections to the findings and 5 recommendations. 6 Dated: April 10, 2020 7 8 9 10 /brow0329.36sec 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.