(HC) Randall v. Sacramento County Judge, No. 2:2019cv00150 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER and, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/18/19 ORDERING that the Clerk shall ASSIGN a district judge to this action; CASE ASSIGNED to District Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman with new case number 2:19-cv-0150 JAM KJN HC; RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&Rs due within 14 days. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VIRGIL DOUGLAS RANDALL, 12 13 14 15 No. 2: 19-cv-0150 KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO COUNTY JUDGE, Respondent. 16 17 By an order filed January 31, 2019, petitioner was ordered to file an in forma pauperis 18 affidavit or to pay the appropriate filing fee, within thirty days, or his application would be 19 dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s 20 order, has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit, and has not paid the appropriate filing fee. 21 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall assign a district judge to this action; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 27 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 28 Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the 1 1 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 2 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 Dated: March 18, 2019 4 5 6 7 8 Rand150.fr 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.