(PC) White v. Lizaraga et al, No. 2:2018cv03167 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/3/19 ADOPTING 8 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 4 Motion to Remand. (Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) White v. Lizaraga et al Doc. 9 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 KEITH LEE WHITE, 6 7 8 No. 2:18-cv-3167 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOE LIZARAGA, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 12 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 13 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 14 On July 30, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 15 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 16 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No 8. Neither party 17 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 18 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 19 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 20 ORDERED that: 21 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 30, 2019, are adopted in full; 22 2. Plaintiff’s motion to remand this action to the Amador County Superior Court, ECF 23 NO. 4, is DENIED. 24 25 26 27 DATED: September 3, 2019 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
