(PC) Hill v. Baughman et al, No. 2:2018cv03089 - Document 19 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/10/2019 ADOPTING 15 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 13 Motion for TRO. (Huang, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CYMEYON HILL, 12 13 No. 2:18-cv-3089 MCE AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER 14 DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a civil detainee proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On August 8, 2019, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 15. Plaintiff has 23 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1. The findings and recommendations issued August 8, 2019 (ECF No. 15) are ADOPTED in full, and 1 1 2 3 4 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order, filed July 16, 2019 (ECF No. 13), is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 10, 2019 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
