(PC) Horsley v. County of Sacramento et al, No. 2:2018cv02901 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/3/2019 ORDERING Clerk of Court to assign a district judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER HORSLEY, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:18-cv-2901 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, and SHERIFF SCOTT JONES, Defendants. 16 17 18 By an order filed February 13, 2019, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to 19 the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. That 20 thirty-day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order. 21 22 23 24 25 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and 1 1 Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 2 may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 3 Cir. 1991). 4 Dated: April 3, 2019 5 6 /hors2901.fusm 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.