(PC) Vargas v. Banasurie, No. 2:2018cv02774 - Document 41 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/7/2020 ADOPTING 40 Findings and Recommendations in full. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; FRCP 41(b). CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
(PC) Vargas v. Banasurie Doc. 41 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NATHAN VARGAS, 12 No. 2:18-cv-02774-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 THOMAS BANSURIE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Nathan Vargas (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights 17 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 03, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which 20 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 40.) Plaintiff has 23 not filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 24 25 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 26 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 27 1983); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Having reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 03, 2020 (ECF No. 40), are adopted 5 in full; and 6 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 DATED: April 7, 2020 9 10 11 12 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.