(PC) Gibbs v. County of Shasta et al, No. 2:2018cv02594 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/19/19 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT A. GIBBS, 12 No. 2:18-cv-2594 MCE KJN P Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 COUNTY OF SHASTA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 By order filed March 11, 2019, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within thirty days, 17 18 why his action should not be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has 19 not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 20 21 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 23 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 24 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 25 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 26 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 2 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 Dated: April 19, 2019 4 5 /gibb2594.fsc 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
