(HC) Johnson v. Thompsen, No. 2:2018cv02580 - Document 24 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/30/2020 ADOPTING 13 Findings and Recommendations in full; This Action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and The Court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTOINE DOUGLASS JOHNSON, 12 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-2580 MCE AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER PAUL THOMPSEN, WARDEN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this 18 application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF Nos. 1, 2. The matter 19 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 20 Rule 302. 21 On February 25, 2020, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein 22 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 23 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 13. Petitioner 24 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 14. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 26 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 27 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 28 analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations issued February 25, 2020 (ECF No. 13), are 3 ADOPTED in full; 4 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice, and 5 3. The Court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. 6 7 8 § 2253. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 30, 2020 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.