(PC) Bonilla v. Brennan et al, No. 2:2018cv02424 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/15/2018 ORDERING the Clerk of Court to randomly appoint a District Judge to this matter and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failur e to pay the filing fee. District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller has been assigned. The case number for all future documents shall be 2:18-cv-02424-KJM-DB (PC). Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Huang, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-2424 DB P v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS EDMUND F. BRENNAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. This proceeding was referred to by this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19 636(b)(1). On October 26, 2018, having determined that plaintiff is a three strikes litigant within the 20 21 meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), the court found that plaintiff is precluded from proceeding in 22 forma pauperis. (See ECF No. 4). As a result, it directed him to pay the filing fee within twenty- 23 one days prior to continuing with these proceedings or risk dismissal of the action. See id. 24 Twenty-one days have passed, and plaintiff has neither responded to the court’s order nor paid the 25 filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly appoint a 26 27 United States District Court Judge to this matter. 28 //// 1 1 2 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee as required in light of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 5 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 6 with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 7 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 8 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 9 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 Dated: November 15, 2018 11 12 13 14 15 DLB:13 DB/ORDERS/ORDERS/PRISONER.CIVIL RIGHTS/boni2424.f&r.dsms.1915g 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
