Emerson et al v. Mitchell, No. 2:2018cv02200 - Document 29 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/4/19 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed 11/29/18 (ECF No. 24 ) in full; and DENYING the Defendant's 8/13/18 motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2 ). (Becknal, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Emerson et al v. Mitchell Doc. 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KATHLEEN EMERSON, et al., Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-02200-TLN-DB ORDER KRISTA MITCHELL, Defendant. 15 16 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 19.) On 17 18 November 29, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were 19 served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 20 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and 21 recommendations. (ECF No. 24.) Defendant has filed objections to the findings and 22 recommendations. (ECF No. 25.) The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 29, 2018 (ECF No. 24) are adopted 3 in full; and 2. Defendant’s August 13, 2018 motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is 4 5 denied. 6 7 Dated: February 4, 2019 8 9 10 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
