(PC) Bonilla v. Long, No. 2:2018cv02162 - Document 14 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/15/2018 ORDERING Clerk of Court to randomly assign a district court judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:18-CV-02162 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER & FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MICHAEL J. LONG, Defendant. 16 By an order filed September 4, 2018, plaintiff was ordered to pay the filing fee within 17 fourteen days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this 18 action be dismissed. The fourteen day period has now expired, and plaintiff has failed to comply 19 with the court’s order, although he has filed a litany of “notices” and objections that do not 20 address the fee issue. ECF Nos. 6-12. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a 22 district court judge to this case. 23 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 24 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 28 1 1 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 2 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 3 objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 4 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 5 appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 Dated: October 15, 2018 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 12/boni2162.fifp.docx 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.