(PC)Hanif v. Warden, No. 2:2018cv02144 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/18/2018 ADOPTING 7 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC)Hanif v. Warden Doc. 8 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 RAHIM AHMED HANIF, 6 Plaintiff, 7 8 9 No. 2:18-cv-2144-JAM-EFB P v. ORDER JAMES WARDEN, PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE, Defendant. 10 11 12 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking 13 relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 14 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 15 On November 8, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 16 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 17 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 18 objections to the findings and recommendations. 19 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 20 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 21 ORDERED that: 22 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 8, 2018, are adopted in full; and 23 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. 24 25 26 27 DATED: December 18, 2018 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
