(PC) Leonard v. Casillas et al, No. 2:2018cv02004 - Document 81 (E.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/2/2021 ADOPTING 73 The Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 56 Defendant Foster and Shahids Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 61 Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants Foster and Shahid are DISMISSED from this action. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FREDERICK E. LEONARD, 12 No. 2:18-cv-2004 WBS CKD P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 G. CASILLAS, 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 22, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 22, 2021, are adopted in full; 3 2. Defendant Foster and Shahid’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 56) is granted; 4 3. Plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 61) is denied; and 5 4. Defendants Foster and Shahid are dismissed from this action. 6 Dated: April 2, 2021 7 8 9 10 11 leon2004.jo 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.