(HC) Johnson v. Thompsen, No. 2:2018cv01977 - Document 28 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/30/2020 ADOPTING 16 Findings and Recommendations in full; This petition is DISMISSED without prejudice, and The Court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in U.S.C. § 2253. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
(HC) Johnson v. Thompsen Doc. 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTOINE DOUGLASS JOHNSON, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-1977 JAM AC P v. ORDER PAUL THOMPSEN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this 18 application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF Nos. 1, 2. The matter 19 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 20 Rule 302. On February 25, 2020, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein 21 22 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 23 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. See ECF No. 16. 24 Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 18. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 26 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 27 //// 28 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 2 analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations issued February 25, 2020 (ECF No. 16), are 5 ADOPTED in full; 6 2. This petition is DISMISSED without prejudice, and 7 3. The court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 8 2253. 9 10 11 12 DATED: April 30, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.