(PC) Jordan v. Haggard et al, No. 2:2018cv01907 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/21/2018 ORDERING Clerk of Court to assign a district judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARENCE LAMONT JORDAN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-1907 KJN P ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. LORI HAGGARD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 By an order filed July 16, 2018, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma 17 18 pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement, and was cautioned 19 that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty- 20 day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed 21 the required documents. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff 22 23 was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current 24 address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 25 the party is fully effective. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 26 27 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 28 //// 1 1 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 2 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 3 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 4 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 5 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 6 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 7 objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 8 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 9 appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 Dated: August 21, 2018 11 12 /jord1907.fifp 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.