(PS) Lehrfeld v. Edgemonti et al, No. 2:2018cv01755 - Document 43 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/21/19 ADOPTING 34 Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 21 Motion to Remand; and DENYING 18 Motion to Withdraw plaintiff's attorney and stay this action without prejudice as moot; and REMANDING CASE to Sacramento Superior Court. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
(PS) Lehrfeld v. Edgemonti et al Doc. 43 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 DAVID IAN LEHRFELD, individual and dba Quadrasphere, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 No. 2:18-cv-1755 MCE DB PS ORDER v. ROBERT EDGEMONTI, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 Defendants are proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred 18 19 to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On May 20, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations (“F&Rs”) 20 21 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 22 F&Rs were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 34. The time for filing objections has 23 expired, and Defendants have filed objections to the F&Rs. ECF No. 35. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the file and finds the F&Rs to be supported 24 25 by the record and by proper analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The F&Rs filed May 20, 2019 (ECF No. 34) are ADOPTED in full; 3 2. Plaintiff’s January 2, 2019 Motion to Remand (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED; 4 3. Defendants’ Motion to Withdraw Plaintiff’s Attorney and Stay this action (ECF No. 5 18) is DENIED without prejudice as moot; and 6 4. This action is REMANDED to the Sacramento County Superior Court. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: August 21, 2019 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 \lehrfeld1755.jo 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.