(PC) Rutledge v. Lassen County District Attorney et al, No. 2:2018cv01723 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/30/2018 ORDERING the Clerk of Court to assign a district court judge to this case and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Senior Jud ge William B. Shubb has been assigned. The case number for all future documents shall be: 2:18-cv-01723-WBS-CKD (PC). Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Huang, H)
Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRAVIS RUTLEDGE, 12 13 14 15 16 17 No. 2:18-cv-1723 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND LASSEN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. By order filed October 18, 2018, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave 18 to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff 19 has not filed an amended complaint. Although it appears from the court’s docket that plaintiff’s 20 copy of the court’s October 18, 2018 order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the 21 plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to 22 Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 23 24 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 28 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after 1 1 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 2 the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 3 Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 4 waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 5 1991). 6 Dated: November 30, 2018 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 rutl1723.fta 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2