(PC) Anderson v. Rose, No. 2:2018cv01216 - Document 55 (E.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/18/2019 ADOPTING 54 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING Case without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (York, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Anderson v. Rose Doc. 55 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 TUANJA EDWARD ANDERSON, 6 No. 2: 18-cv-1216 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 C. ROSE, et al., 9 ORDER Defendants. 10 11 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 12 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 13 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 14 On November 15, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 15 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 16 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 17 objections to the findings and recommendations. 18 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 19 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 20 ORDERED that: 21 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 15, 2019, are adopted in full; 22 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice; and 23 3. The Clerk of the Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions and close this case. 24 25 26 27 DATED: December 18, 2019 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
