(PC) Williams v. Brunkhorst, et al., No. 2:2018cv01163 - Document 19 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/23/2019 ORDERING Clerk of Court to randomly assign this matter to a district judge and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
(PC) Williams v. Brunkhorst, et al. Doc. 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RODNEY ALLEN WILLIAMS 12 13 14 15 No. 2:18-cv-01163-CKD-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND BRUNKHORST, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 17 By order filed February 6, 2019, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave 18 to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff was granted two additional extensions of 19 time to comply with this order. ECF Nos. 15, 17. The allotted time has now expired, and 20 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Plaintiff 21 has consented to this court’s jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 302. 22 23 24 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign this matter to a district court judge. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 28 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 2 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 3 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 4 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 Dated: July 23, 2019 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/will1163.fta.docx 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.