(HC) Thompson v. Paramo, No. 2:2018cv01156 - Document 11 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/17/2018 ADOPTING 10 Findings and Recommendations in full, DISMISSING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus without prejudice to filing a new action, and DECLINING to issue a certificate of appealability. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
(HC) Thompson v. Paramo Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONALD J. THOMPSON, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-1156-JAM-EFB P v. ORDER DANIEL PARAMO, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 17 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 11, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 11, 2018, are adopted in full; 2 2. Petitioner’s application for writ of habeas corpus is summarily dismissed without 3 prejudice to filing a new action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983; 4 3. The Clerk is directed to close the case; and 5 4. The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. 6 7 8 9 DATED: December 17, 2018 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.