(SS) Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 2:2018cv01144 - Document 22 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/25/19 ADOPTING 19 Findings and Recommendations, DENYING 16 Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTING 17 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The Commissioner's final decision is AFFIRMED. CASE CLOSED. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
(SS) Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANNETTE SANCHEZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:18-CV-01144-TLN-DMC v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial review of 17 18 a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The matter 19 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local 20 rules. On August 7, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 22 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 23 within the time specified therein. (ECF No. 19.) On August 21, 2019, Plaintiff filed her 24 Objections to Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 20.) On August 29, 2019, Defendant 25 filed a Response. (ECF No. 21.) 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304(f), this 27 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 2 analysis. The Court further notes Plaintiff’s objections merely reiterate arguments made in her 3 moving papers on summary judgment, which the magistrate judge properly addressed and 4 rejected in the Findings and Recommendations. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed August 7, 2019 (ECF No. 19), are adopted 7 in full; 8 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 16) is DENIED; 9 3. Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED; 10 4. The Commissioner’s final decision is AFFIRMED; and 11 5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 Dated: September 25, 2019 14 15 16 17 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.