(PC) Eiland v. Sacramento County Main Jail Medical Facility et al, No. 2:2018cv01042 - Document 53 (E.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 12/4/2020 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed 10/27/2020, (ECF No. 52 ) in full;DISMISSING Plaintiff's claims against the John Doe defendants without prejudice and this action is terminated and judgment is entered. (See ECF No. 49 ). CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
(PC) Eiland v. Sacramento County Main Jail Medical Facility et al Doc. 53 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RODNEY CHARLES EILAND, 12 13 14 15 No. 2: 18-cv-1042 MCE KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 19 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 20 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On October 27, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 22 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 23 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 26 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 27 ORDERED that: 28 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 27, 2020, (ECF No. 52) are 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiff’s claims against the John Doe defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 4 3. This action is terminated and judgment is entered. (See ECF No. 49). 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: December 4, 2020 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.