(PC) Petit v. Solano County Jail, No. 2:2018cv00992 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 06/07/18 ORDERING the Clerk is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Petit v. Solano County Jail Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 SUKINYA PETIT, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:18-cv-0992-EFB P v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, 14 Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 26, 2018, the court found that plaintiff had failed to pay the $400 filing 18 fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) or request leave to proceed in forma pauperis and submit the 19 affidavit and trust account statement required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the court 20 ordered plaintiff to submit either the filing fee or the application required by § 1915(a) within 21 thirty days and warned plaintiff that failure to do so may result in this action being dismissed. 22 ECF No. 3. The time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, submitted an 23 application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or otherwise responded to the court’s order.1 24 25 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this case. 26 1 27 28 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. Dockets.Justia.com 1 Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 2 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 3 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 4 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 5 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 6 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 7 objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 8 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 9 appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 10 v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 11 Dated: June 7, 2018. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
