(PS) Iegorova v. Light House Apartments, No. 2:2018cv00971 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/2/18, RECOMMENDING that Plaintiff's complaint should be dismissed without further leave to amend; the Clerk should be instructed to close this case; no certificate of appealability should be issued. Within 20 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Matter REFERRED to District Judge John A. Mendez. (Kastilahn, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Iegorova v. Light House Apartments Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LIUDMYLA IEGOROVA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-00971-JAM-GGH FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. LIGHT HOUSE APARTMENTS, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff filed her complaint pro se on April 19, 2018, ECF No. 1, and was granted in 19 forma pauperis status on May 29, 2018. ECF No. 3 at 17-19. On the same date this court 20 dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for failing to state a basis for jurisdiction in this federal district 21 court and gave plaintiff 45 days in which to file an amended complaint that conformed to the 22 instructions given in the Order. ECF No. 3. 23 24 Plaintiff, however, did not file any amended complaint thereby apparently conceding that she could not do so under the limits explained in the court’s Order. 25 In light of the foregoing IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 26 1. Plaintiff’s complaint should be dismissed without further leave to amend; 27 2. The Clerk should be instructed to close this case; 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 3. 2 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 3 assigned to this case pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty days 4 after being served with these findings and recommendations plaintiff may file written objections 5 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 6 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 7 time may waive her right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 8 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 Dated: August 2, 2018 10 No certificate of appealability should be issued. /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
