(PC) Stribling v. Lewis, No. 2:2018cv00951 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/2/2018 ORDERING Clerk to randomly assign a U.S. District Judge to this action and RECOMMENDING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP be denied and Plaintiff be ordered to pay the $400 filing fee within 14 days from the date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations and be warned that failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action. Assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Stribling v. Lewis Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 AARON LAMONT STRIBLING, 11 12 13 No. 2:18-cv-0951-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS J. LEWIS, 14 Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. 17 § 1983, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). For the reasons 18 stated below, the court finds that plaintiff has not demonstrated he is eligible to proceed in forma 19 pauperis. 20 A prisoner may not proceed in forma pauperis: 21 if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 22 23 24 25 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Court records reflect that on at least three prior occasions, plaintiff has 26 brought actions while incarcerated that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to 27 state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See (1) Stribling v. Defazio, No. 2:12-cv-2729- 28 JAM-EFB (E.D. Cal.), ECF No. 14 (September 5, 2013 order dismissing action for failure to 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 prosecute and failure to state a claim); (2) Stribling v. Tobias, No. 2:16-cv-00399-MCE-EFB 2 (E.D. Cal.), ECF No. 17 (September 2, 2016 order dismissing action for failure to prosecute and 3 failure to state a claim); and (3) Stribling v. Chooljian, No. 2:18-cv-00266-CAS-FFM (C.D. Cal.), 4 ECF No. 5 (January 17, 2018 order dismissing action as frivolous, failing to state a claim, and 5 seeking monetary relief from a defendant immune from such relief). 6 The section 1915(g) exception applies if the complaint makes a plausible allegation that 7 the prisoner faced “imminent danger of serious physical injury” at the time of filing. 28 U.S.C. 8 § 1915(g); Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1055 (9th Cir. 2007). In this case, plaintiff 9 alleges that his personal medical information was stolen after being left unprotected by an 10 employee of the California Correctional Health Care Services (CCHCS). ECF No. 1 at 3. 11 Attached to the complaint is a May 16, 2016 letter from CCHCS notifying plaintiff of this 12 “potential breach” of his confidential information. See id. at 12 (notifying plaintiff that a laptop, 13 which might have contained sensitive personal information, was stolen from the vehicle of a 14 CCHCS employee). Plaintiff claims that having his identity stolen stresses him out “beyond 15 belief.” Id. at 3. These allegations do not demonstrate that plaintiff was under an imminent 16 danger of serious physical injury when he filed this action, on April 17, 2018. Plaintiff’s 17 application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis must therefore be denied pursuant to § 1915(g). 18 Plaintiff must submit the appropriate filing fee in order to proceed with this action. 19 20 21 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. Further, because plaintiff has not paid the filing fee and is not eligible to proceed in forma pauperis, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 23 1. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) be denied; and 24 2. Plaintiff be ordered to pay the $400 filing fee within fourteen days from the date of any 25 order adopting these findings and recommendations and be warned that failure to do so will result 26 in the dismissal of this action. 27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 28 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 2 1 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 2 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 3 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 4 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 5 Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 Dated: May 2, 2018. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
