(PC) Tate v. Andres, No. 2:2018cv00822 - Document 37 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/11/19 ADOPTING 33 Findings and Recommendations in full DENYING 29 Motion to Strike and DENYING 30 Motion for TRO. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
(PC) Tate v. Andres Doc. 37 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DEREK TATE, 11 12 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-0822 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. ANDRES, Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil 17 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On October 25, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 20 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 33. Neither party 22 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 24 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 25 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 26 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 27 . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 28 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 25, 2019 (ECF No. 33), are adopted 3 in full. 4 2. Plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant’s affirmative defenses (ECF No. 29) is denied. 5 3. Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order (ECF No. 30) is denied. 6 4. This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 7 proceedings. 8 DATED: December 11, 2019. 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.