(PC) Uribe v. Shinnette et al, No. 2:2018cv00689 - Document 38 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/11/18 ADOPTING 27 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 25 Motion for TRO. (Coll, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Uribe v. Shinnette et al Doc. 38 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 JOEL URIBE, 6 7 8 No. 2:18-cv-0689 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER E. SHINNETTE, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 12 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 13 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 14 On October 30, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 15 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 16 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 17 objections to the findings and recommendations. 18 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 19 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 20 ORDERED that: 21 22 23 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 30, 2018 (ECF No. 27) are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order (ECF No. 25) is denied. 24 25 26 27 DATED: December 11, 2018 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
