(HC) Taft v. Martinez, No. 2:2018cv00564 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in Full signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/29/2018 DISMISSING this action as duplicative of Case No. 1:18-cv-0412 DAD JLT P. CASE CLOSED. (Fabillaran, J)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BENJAMIN R. TAFT, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-0564 WBS AC P v. ORDER JOEL MARTINEZ, 15 Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 17 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 25, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 5. Petitioner has 23 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 25, 2018, are adopted in full; 27 28 //// 1 1 2 2. This action is dismissed as duplicative of Case No. 1:18-cv-0412 DAD JLT P. Dated: May 29, 2018 3 4 5 6 7 Taft0564.800.hc 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
