(PS) Moses v. Municipality City of Redding, No. 2:2018cv00434 - Document 21 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 10/23/18 ADOPTING in full 19] FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendant's 14 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's state tort claim and DENIED as to Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim.(Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
(PS) Moses v. Municipality City of Redding Doc. 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT B. MOSES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:18-cv-0434 MCE AC PS v. ORDER MUNICIPALITY CITY OF REDDING, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 17 18 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On August 13, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations (ECF 19 20 No. 19) herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days. 22 Neither party filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file, and finds the Findings and Recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. 2 ADOPTED in full; and 3 2. Defendant’s Motion (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s state tort claim, and 4 DENIED as to Plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 The Findings and Recommendations filed August 13, 2018 (ECF No. 19) are Dated: October 23, 2018 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.